Larson v. Tansy’s Empirical Analysis
911 F.2d 392 · 1990
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably 36 Cal. 4th 510 - People v. Davis (2005), United States v. Gomez (1995)
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Kentucky v. Stincer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not require the defendant's presence when his presence would be useless, or the benefit nebulous.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. White · People v. Payne“The record indicates defendant’s counsel, and not defendant, waived defendant’s right of presence at trial. The trial court never directly addressed defendant concerning his counsel’s request to conduct the remainder of the trial in defendant’s absence. We hold that defendant did not waive his right to be present.... Even if defense counsel could have validly waived defendant’s right to be present for the conclusion of his trial, where defense counsel did not consult with defendant concerning the waiver and did not obtain defendant’s consent, the waiver will not be binding on defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'substantial' " due process right under Snyder, since the "defendant's mere presence, aside from any assistance defendant could have given to his counsel, would have been useful and would have provided more than a shadow of benefit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Luu v. People · Rice v. Wood Rice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.