Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 911 F.2d 403 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

911 F.2d 403 · 1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
January 2001
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 659

Relies on Sloan v. Hicks · Ford v. Wainwright · Lewis v. Adamson · United States v. Beaulieu · United States v. Espinosa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e will reverse only if we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Combining these factors, it becomes obvious that a plan was formulated and implemented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the offense involved more than minimal planning, increase by 2 levels.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.