United States v. Dunkley’s Empirical Analysis
911 F.2d 522 · 1990
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Zapata (1999), State v. Konfrst (1996)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bonner v. City of Prichard · United States v. Matlock · Carnegie v. United States · Illinois v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the driver of a vehicle has some amount of joint access to the vehicle, and, in fact, the driver has immediate control over the vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Boggess
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.