Gafurova v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
911 F.3d 321 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Heckler v. Chaney · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Morton v. Ruiz · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bereft of factual and legal support, [thus, Daneshvar] has not properly developed this argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.