State v. Hunn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Accordingly, we hold that the limited right to counsel recognized by Friedman [v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 473 N.W.2d 828 (1991) ] is triggered only when the implied-consent advisory is read. This rule of law does not mean that officers may force an individual to submit to chemical testing. Significantly, the statutes covering breath, blood, and urine tests both provide that, in most situations, if a person refuses testing, the test "must not be given." Minn. Stat. § 169A.52, subd. 1 (2016) ; Minn. Stat. § 171.177 , subd. 13(a) (Supp. 2017).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mike · State v. Wood

2. “it may not be clear to a driver faced with the advisory whether the consequences for consenting or refusing will be worse.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rosenbush · State v. Mike

3. “Because the officer did not read the implied-consent advisory here, under Friedman the limited right to counsel was not triggered.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mike