Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 911 P.2d 1004 - State v. MacOn

State v. MacOn’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably 90 Wash. App. 890 - State v. Picard (1998), In Re Crabtree (2000)

28 state decisions

180199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Whittington · Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc. · Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · 96 Wash. 2d 215 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) will probably change the result of the trial; (2) was discovered after the trial; (3) could not have been discovered before trial by the exercise of due diligence; (4) is material; and (5) is not merely cumulative or impeaching. A new trial may be denied if any one of these factors is absent.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: "(2) Newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under rule 7.6.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the trial court must first determine whether the recantation is reliable before considering a defendant's motion for new trial based upon the recantation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.