Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 911 P2D 257 - Resolution Trust Corp. v. Greer

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Russell v. Board of County Commissioners (1997), United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. Reed (1996)

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

1401995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pepper v. Litton · O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. · Delgado Oil Co. v. Torres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). In Oklahoma, a cause of action exists to satisfy the needs of plaintiffs for a means of redress, of defendants for a conceptual context within which to defend an accusation, and of the courts for a framework within which to administer justice. . . . . . . . [T]his jurisdiction is committed to the wrongful act or transactional definition of a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after the cause of action shall have accrued, and not afterwards.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “lies either in contract imposed by law or in trust created by operation of law. The former is promise-based; the latter is rested on a relational duty created by the ancient rules of chancery jurisprudence. Actions to enforce implied-in-law contracts are governed by a three-year limitation. If fraudulent conduct is alleged in a breach-of-trust action, the applicable limitation is two years. But if not, the exact limitation period that governs is not firmly settled by extant jurisprudence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.