Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 911 P.2d 272 - Cox v. Dawson

Cox v. Dawson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. (1996), Keating v. Edmondson (2001)

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission · Fuller v. Odom · Hendrick v. Walters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under our case law, we hesitate to construe any statute that appears clear and unambiguous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Nealis v. Baird · Berryman v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
  2. “"... All courts, boards, commissions, agencies, authorities, instrumentalities, and officers of the State of Oklahoma shall take judicial or official notice of any rule, amendment, revision, or revocation of an existing rule promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act...."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Davis v. GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. · Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.
  3. “Having determined that the statute is unclear, we may resort to available sources of interpretative assistance to determine the Legislature's intent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. KOHLER v. CHAMBERS · KOHLER v. CHAMBERS

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.