Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 492 So. 2d 562 - Graves v. State · 791 So. 2d 904 - Francis v. State · 758 So. 2d 480 - Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge is empowered with the discretion to consider and to decide what evidence is admissible, and unless this judicial discretion is so abused as to be prejudicial to the accused, then the ruling of the lower court must be affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he standard of review of a trial court's admission of evidence is abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.