Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona · Schriro Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Summerlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the trial court erred when it denied the motion to file the third amended petition, that error was harmless. ... [e]ven if the trial court had granted the motion to amend, Wilson would not have been entitled to any relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[c]oncerns of undue delay and undue prejudice to the State were not implicated as a result of these amendments; concerns of fairness and due process were implicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.