911 So. 2d 550 - Tyler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hernandez v. New York · 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State · 517 So. 2d 1346 - Lockett v. State · 587 So. 2d 848 - Holland v. State · 735 So. 2d 323 - Manning v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Batson provides procedural directives for the trial court to follow in detecting and disallowing the practice of using peremptory challenges to remove members of an identified racial group [or gender] from jury service based upon nothing more than their racial [or gender] identification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race [or gender]. Second, if the requisite showing has been made, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to articulate a race-neutral explanation for striking the jurors in question. Finally, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has carried his burden of proving purposeful discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any determination made by a trial judge under Batson is accorded great deference because it is 'based, in a large part, on credibility.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.