¶1We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch*851field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
¶2AFFIRMED.
911 So. 2d 850
Mills v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 19, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-09-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2006
1 state decisions
Relies on Barnes v. Sanders
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-09-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →