911 So. 2d 947 - Willis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 603 So. 2d 857 - Ross v. State · 536 So. 2d 1314 - Corley v. State · 907 So. 2d 985 - Frazier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, after such opportunity, the defense claims unfair surprise or undue prejudice and seeks a continuance or mistrial, the court shall, in the interest of justice and absent unusual circumstances, exclude the evidence or grant a continuance for a period of time reasonably necessary for the defense to meet the non-disclosed evidence or grant a mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. State“(1) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (2) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; and (3) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.