911 So. 2d 951 - Yarbrough v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a "distinctive" group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury selection process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ellis v. State

2. “It may, however, be admissible for other purposes such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 962 So. 2d 649 - Jackson v. State

3. “because jurors are presumed to follow a judge's instructions). ¶ 107. Additionally, Jackson's brief states that the prosecution”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 962 So. 2d 649 - Jackson v. State