Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 912 F.2d 178 - Herr v. Sullivan

Herr v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

912 F.2d 178 · 1990

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Ehrhart v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1992), Powers v. Apfel (2000)

17 federal appellate ·

590199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Walker v. Bowen · Garfield v. Schweiker · Steward v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An ALJ’s credibility determinations will be affirmed on appeal unless the appellant can demonstrate that they are “patently wrong.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he existence of an evidentiary dispute, in and of itself, does not present a ground for reversing the ALJ's decision to credit one particular version of the events over another.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.