Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 912 F.2d 405 - National Advertising Company v. City and County of Denver

National Advertising Company v. City and County of Denver’s Empirical Analysis

912 F.2d 405 · 1990

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 12 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Citizens for Responsible Government State Political Action Committee v. Donetta Davidson (2000), Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of Mesa (1993)

16 federal appellate · 12 district · 4 state decisions

220199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] declaratory judgment on the validity of [the] repealed ordinance is a textbook example of advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We reject appellants’ claim that the ordinance is broader than necessary and, therefore, fails the fourth part of the Central Hudson test. If the city has a sufficient basis for believing that billboards are traffic hazards and are unattractive, then obviously the most direct and perhaps the only effective approach to solving the problems they create is to prohibit them. The city has gone no further than necessary in seeking to meet its ends. Indeed, it has stopped short of fully accomplishing its ends: It has not prohibited all billboards, but alloy/s onsite advertising and some other specifically exempted signs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bound by judicial precedent in determining what is commercial speech”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.