← 912 F.2d 525 - Magerer v. John Sexton & Co.

Magerer v. John Sexton & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

912 F.2d 525 · 1990

Citation profile

cited by 60 later decisions

states following

March 2021

most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 24 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Abramian v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (2000), 31 Mass. App. Ct. 294 - Ourfalian v. Aro Manufacturing Co. (1991)

19 federal appellate · 24 district · 13 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · Delaware v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[n]o employer ... shall ... refuse to hire or in any other manner discriminate against an employee because the employee has exercised a right afforded by this [workers compensation] chapter.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 31 Mass. App. Ct. 294 - Ourfalian v. Aro Manufacturing Co. · 833 F. Supp. 69 - Devlin v. WSi Corp.
“In the event that any right set forth in this section is inconsistent with an applicable collective bargaining agreement, such agreement shall prevail.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 81 F. Supp. 2d 84 - Bishop v. Bell Atlantic Corp. · Fant v. New England Power Service Co.
“[s]uits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Acciavatti v. Professional Services Group, Inc. · 294 F. Supp. 2d 143 - Alfaro v. Crowley Liner Services, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.