Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 912 F.2d 643 - Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology

Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology’s Empirical Analysis

912 F.2d 643 · 1990

Citation profile

156
cited by 156 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 28 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 156 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Artway v. Attorney General of New Jersey (1996), Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (1994)

42 federal appellate · 28 district · 1 state decisions

5701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Landis v. North American Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he difference between an abstract question and a “controversy” contemplated by the Declaratory Judgment Act is necessarily one of degree, and it would be difficult, if it would be possible, to fashion a precise test for determining in every case whether there is such a controversy. Basically, the question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]ny court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the adversity of the interest of the parties, the conclusiveness of the judicial judgment and the practical help, or utility, of that judgment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.