Manning v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
912 F.2d 878 · 1990
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Murnahan (1992), Byrd v. Collins (2000)
38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Nicholas v. United States · Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon · State v. Howard · 53 Ohio App. 3d 117 - State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exhaustion requirement is satisfied when the highest court in the state in which the petitioner was convicted has been given a full and fair opportunity to rule on the petitioner's claims.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o exhaust his or her remedies, a petitioner for federal habeas corpus relief is only required to raise his claims before the state's highest court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[t]he factual and theoretical substance of a claim'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.