Parrish v. Dingman’s Empirical Analysis
912 F.3d 464 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Graham v. Connor · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · Kingsley v. Hendrickson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“officers are often forced to make split-second judgments-in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving-about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fischer v. Hoven“from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fischer v. Hoven“common technique to restrain individuals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fischer v. Hoven
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.