State v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably State v. Werner (1996), 84 Wash. App. 33 - State v. Carlyle (1996)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Arizona v. Washington · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · United States v. Josef Perez · Smith v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a jury is discharged because it is unable to reach a verdict on a criminal charge, ... that event does not bar retrial on the charge under double jeopardy clauses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ahluwalia“[U]navailability of counsel may constitute unforeseen or unavoidable circumstances to warrant a trial extension under CrR 3.3(d)(8).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“It shall be the responsibility of the court to ensure a trial in accordance with [CrR 3.3] to each person charged with a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.