State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 25 U.S.C. § 1321 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · United States v. John · United States v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“set forth the factual basis for this contention”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. L.J.M. · State v. LJM“`Indian country', as used in this chapter, means (a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a state, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cooper“whether the State has criminal jurisdiction turn[ed] on whether the property is trust land ... for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1151 , 1153.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LJM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.