912 So. 2d 1044 - Magee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · California v. Trombetta · McClain v. State · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. She also stated that the prosecutor looked familiar but was not sure she recognized her. Id. She later stated that she could put this aside and judge the case fairly. Id. In granting the challenge for cause, the court stated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“her opinions were so strong and of such a nature originally that the Court is of the opinion that she has a bias which is so strong would [sic] not make her fair to sit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.