¶2While it may be prudent for this court to review evidence regarding the first prong of the Ex parte Beasley,564 So.2d 950 (Ala. 1990), test in the termination-of-parental-rights case, I do not believe that, with regard to A.A. and M.J., "it is necessary," as stated by the main opinion, because that issue was not raised on appeal by A.A. or M.J.
912 So. 2d 261
A.A. v. Cleburne County Dhr
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided May 6, 2005
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2005-05-06
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2015
12 state decisions
Relies on 564 So. 2d 950 - Ex Parte Beasley
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-05-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →