912 So. 2d 332 - Perritte v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 901 So. 2d 781 - Pena v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]mplicit in the Apprendi rationale . . . is the common sense concept that there must be some dispute about a fact before it is required to be submitted to a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unlike more amorphous sentence-enhancing concepts such as `motive' . . . in the Apprendi case, age amounts to a physical fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.