Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

912 So. 2d 644

Docket No. 4D05-1753.

Epps v. State

Felton Ernest EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 2005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-09-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on 763 So. 2d 1155 - Hollis v. State · Moore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-09-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Felton Ernest Epps, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed. A defective notice of intent to habitualize is a procedural error which does not result in an illegal sentence which can be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Moore v. State, 810 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); *645 Hollis v. State, 763 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

¶6WARNER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

/912/so2d/644 · .json · Public domain