912 So. 2d 982 - James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Abatino v. United States · 625 So. 2d 407 - Gladney v. Clarksdale Beverage Co., Inc. · Fox v. United States · State v. Rideout · Hickson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the polling procedure denied him due process and equal protection, (2) the failure to fully reconstitute the jury denied him due process, (3) the failure to grant his motion for a new trial was error, (4) the failure to sustain his objections to the jury polling procedure and the polling questions was error, (5) the failure to allow him to poll the jury was error, and (6) the court failed to sanction the State for improper contact with the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“REMARKS: JUDGE TERRY TO HEAR/1ST VICTIM.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.