Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 912 SW2D 92 - State v. Conaway

State v. Conaway’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2017

17 state decisions

100199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thummel v. King · Draper v. Aronowitz · Thompson v. Thompson · In Re Marriage of Cohen · Johnson v. Patrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'We are not required to review points or arguments when they appear without citation of applicable authority.' ” State v. Sullivan, 935 S.W.2d 747 , 760 (Mo.App.1996) (quoting State v. Conaway, 912 S.W.2d 92, 95 (Mo.App. 1995)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The points relied on shall state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When no authority is cited and no explanation is given, points relied on are deemed waived or abandoned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.