Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 A2D 1022 - State v. Imbruglia

State v. Imbruglia’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

51 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Holland v. United States · Victor v. Nebraska · United States v. Woodward · United States v. Fulmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen ruling on a motion for a new trial, the trial justice acts as a thirteenth juror, exercising 'independent judgment on the credibility of witnesses and on the weight of the evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Reasonable doubt’ by definition means a doubt founded upon reason and not conjecture or speculation. A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon evidence or lack of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt exists when, after you have thoroughly considered and examined all of the evidence that is before you, you have a firm belief that the defendant is guilty as charged.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]bsent clear error and absent a determination by this Court that the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material and relevant evidence [relating] to a critical issue in the case, we will defer to the trial justice's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.