Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 A.2d 558 - Guy v. State

Guy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

1 district · 19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · United States v. Natale · Wainwright v. State · Hughes v. State · Flamer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant has no right to have the jury instructed in a particular form. However, a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed with a correct statement of the substantive law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Error can normally be cured by the use of a curative instruction to the jury, and jurors are presumed to follow those instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.