United States v. Manthei’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.2d 1130 · 1990
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Vital (1995), United States v. Alfaro (1990)
47 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Nicholas v. United States · Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Etlin v. Etlin · United States v. Mejia-Orosco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the `offense' for § 3B1.1 purposes includes `criminal activity' greater in scope than the exact, or more limited, activity compromising the elements of the offense charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he offense of conviction involved the last link of a continuous chain of transaction in manufacturing, distributing, and retailing amphetamine.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clear with the little red heads striped all the way across them numerous times.” Vol. II at 64. 2 . At trial, Officer Aaron Jones testified that he was present at Searle’s arrest, and that he and the other officers thoroughly searched the car before releasing it to King and Griffiths. Officer Jones testified that he specifically recalled searching under the seat covers. 3 . The record reflects that Bowen's girlfriend lived with Racine. 4 . The government maintains this issue should be reviewed for plain error because Bowen's objection at the instruction conference was unclear. We need not resolve this issue because Bowen's argument also fails under harmless error review. 5 . The Guidelines define a "participant” as “a person who is criminally responsible for the commission of the offense, but need not have been convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.