Hampton v. Internal Revenue Service’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.2d 180 · 1990
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Rowe v. Sullivan (1992), Pacheco v. Rice (1992)
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7512
Relies on Brown v. General Services Administration · Rideout v. United States · Bush v. Lucas · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before a federal employee may bring an employment-discrimination suit in federal court, he must first exhaust available administrative remedies.”); Porter v. Adams, 639 F.2d 273, 276 (5th Cir. March 1981) (noting that administrative exhaustion is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is well settled that the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act applicable to claims of racial discrimination in federal employment are the exclusive and preemptive remedy for such claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rowe v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.