Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 F.2d 193 - United States v. Beard

United States v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis

913 F.2d 193 · 1990

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus, United States v. Pofahl (1993)

31 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

320199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 3571 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · United States v. Buenrostro · United States v. Thomas · United States v. Otero · United States v. Velasquez-Mercado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires a showing of sincere contrition on the defendant's behalf to warrant the reduction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is a reasonable reading of 18 U.S.C. 152 to conclude that the statute requires a [debtor] to disclose the existence of assets whose immediate status in bankruptcy is uncertain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if in a guilty plea a defendant stipulates to facts that establish a more serious offense than the offense of conviction, that person may be sentenced to the higher offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.