United States v. Barndt’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.2d 201 · 1990
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · United States v. Mejia-Orosco · United States v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant engages in more than minimal planning is a fact question reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.