Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 F.2d 305 - Alltel Tennessee Inc

Alltel Tennessee Inc’s Empirical Analysis

913 F.2d 305 · 1990

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Ammex, Inc. v. Cox (2003), San Juan Cable LLC v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co. (2010)

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

150199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 47 U.S.C. § 401

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n · United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans · Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] plaintiff who seeks injunctive relief from state regulation on the ground that such regulation is preempted by a [F]ederal statute which by virtue of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, must prevail, thus presents a[F]ederal question which the [F]ederal courts have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 to resolve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The First Circuit has ruled that an order resulting from a rulemaking proceeding is not an order under § 401(b). Each of the other Circuits that has addressed this issue, however, has either implicitly or expressly found that such an order may be an order under § 401(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The principal reasons for the doctrine of primary jurisdiction are to obtain the benefit of the expertise and experience of the administrative agencies and the desirable uniformity which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.