Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 F.2d 337 - United States v. Beverly

United States v. Beverly’s Empirical Analysis

913 F.2d 337 · 1990

Citation profile

155
cited by 155 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

119 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 155 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Griffin v. United States (1991), United States v. Townsend (1991)

119 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1390199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 6050I

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Burks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defer to reasonable inferences drawn by the jury and the weight it gave to the evidence.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only when the record is devoid of any evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which a jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.