United States v. Dweck’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.2d 365 · 1990
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Kozinski (1994), United States v. Carson (1993)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Generally, where impeachment evidence is merely cumulative and thereby has no reasonable probability of affecting the result of trial, it does not violate the Brady 6The State criticizes the court of appeals' analysis for "reweighing the witnesses' credibility based on a paper record, displacing the role of the factfinder.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]here is no question that in Brady, the Supreme Court held that the government must disclose evidence that is both favorable and material to the issue of guilt. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within the Brady rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.