Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 F.2d 37 - Porter v. Nutter

Porter v. Nutter’s Empirical Analysis

913 F.2d 37 · 1990

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 24 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Ryan v. Royal Insurance Co. of America (1990), Putnam Resources v. Pateman (1992)

56 federal appellate · 24 district ·

6301990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez · Freeman v. Package Machinery Co. · Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg · Kassel v. Gannett Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur function is not to formulate a tenet which we, as free agents, might think wise, but to ascertain, as best we can, the rule that the state's highest tribunal would likely follow.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reject[s] state-court forum in favor of a federal forum ... is in a perilously poor position to grumble when we follow existing state precedent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “); Porter v. Nutter, 913 F.2d 37 , 41 (1st Cir.1990) (plaintiff who seeks out a federal venue in a diversity action should expect”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.