Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 F.2d 452 - In Re Joseph and Sandra Schaitzs Appeal of Gwenn L Webb and Colton Webb

In Re Joseph and Sandra Schaitzs Appeal of Gwenn L Webb and Colton Webb’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant (1992), In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-Appellant (1994)

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

390199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Little Creek Development Co. v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. · Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Whitman · Rimgale Ravenot v. S Rimgale · Phoenix Piccadilly, Ltd. v. Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n determining whether a plan is filed in good faith, the court is tasked with questioning whether the debtor is 'really trying to pay the creditors to the reasonable limit of his ability or is he trying to thwart them?'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Chapter 13 provides, for individuals, a counterpart to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, which authorizes the reorganization of bankrupt enterprises in lieu of their liquidation. Instead of the trustee’s seizing and selling the bankrupt’s nonexempt assets, as in a Chapter 7 proceeding, under Chapter 13 (as under Chapter 11) the bankrupt proposes a plan for the repayment of his debts out of future income.”). 8 . Order, In re Michael J. Free d/b/a Electra Lighting & Elec. Co., No. 2-10-bk-25460 (CMB), ECF No. 71 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2011) (hereinafter”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Instead of the trustee’s seizing and selling the bankrupt’s non-exempt assets, as in a Chapter 7 proceeding, under Chapter 13 ... the bankrupt proposes a plan for the repayment of his debts out of future income. Sometimes the plan is in the creditors’ best interests, but even if they object to it the bankruptcy judge can cram it down their throats. 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(5)(B).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.