ASPIC Eng'g & Constr. Co. v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.3d 1162 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Kyocera Corporation v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services Inc · Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Associates · Pacific Reinsurance Management Corp. v. Ohio Reinsurance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of an arbitration award under the FAA. Aspic Eng'g & Constr. Co. v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC , 913 F.3d 1162 , 1166 (9th Cir. 2019) (quoting Bosack v. Soward , 586 F.3d 1096 , 1102 (9th Cir. 2009) ). The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv W. Assocs. , 553 F.3d 1277 , 1288 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Poweragent Inc. v. Elec. Data Sys. Corp. , 358 F.3d 1187 , 1193 (9th Cir. 2004) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“disregarded specific provisions of the plain text [of the contracts at issue] in an effort to prevent what the Arbitrator deemed an unfair result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.