United States v. Landeros’s Empirical Analysis
913 F.3d 862 · 2019
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Brown v. Texas · Maryland v. Wilson · Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Extending the stop, and thereby prolonging the officers' exposure to Landeros, was, if anything, 'inversely related to officer safety.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“law enforcement may not require a person to furnish identification, if not reasonably suspected of any criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Perez Cruz v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.