Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 FSUPP 1077 - Smith v. Grumman-Olsen Corp.

Smith v. Grumman-Olsen Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2024

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Erie Co v. Tompkins · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at the time the cause of action accrued.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “incapable of attending to any business, or of taking care of herself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Tennessee case law does provide definitions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.