Taylor v. Cisneros’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2403 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Halper · Robinson v. State of California · United States v. DiFrancesco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“plainly arbitrary and oppressive as to violate the due process clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.