Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

913 N.W.2d 774

State v. Everett

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2018

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2018-07-11

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2025

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-07-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1[¶1] Russell Wayne Everett, Jr. appealed from a district court judgment in which a jury found him guilty on two counts of gross sexual imposition. Everett argues there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to sustain the jury verdict and criminal judgment. Everett also argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial. We conclude there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Everett's motion. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

¶2[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶3Jon J. Jensen

¶4Lisa Fair McEvers

¶5Daniel J. Crothers

¶6Jerod E. Tufte

/913/nw2d/774 · .json · Public domain