Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 P.2d 350 - State v. Gordon

State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2015

17 state decisions

110199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Griffith v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[olnee a trial court on habeas review determines that a defendant has been denied the constitutional right to appeal, a direct appeal should be provided immediately, without adjudication of any other claims, such as ineffective assistance of counsel”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o demonstrate that his defense counsel's assistance was so inadequate as to constitute lack of [effective assistance of] counsel under the Sixth Amendment, [the defendant] must show that (1) his counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonable professional judgment, and (2) he was prejudiced by the deficient performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Regardless of whether the specific holding in Brown is applicable, the Sixth Amendment issue is raised whenever a defendant's attorney has a conflict of interest....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.