Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 P2D 438 - Kleinschmidt v. State

Kleinschmidt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taul v. State · Dean v. State · Yung v. State · Cosco v. State · Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) It is the responsibility of the court, counsel and the defendant to insure that the defendant is timely tried. (2) A criminal charge shall be brought to trial within 120 days following arraignment unless continued as provided in this rule. (8) The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time for trial: (A) All proceedings related to the mental illness or deficiency of the defendant; (B) Proceedings on another charge; (C) Delay granted by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) or (5); (D) The time between the dismissal and the refiling of the same charge; and (E) Delay occasioned by defendant's change of counsel or application therefor. (4) Continuances not to exceed six months from the date of arraignment may be granted by the trial court as follows: (A) On motion of defendant supported by affidavit; or (B) On motion of the attorney for the state or the court if; (i) The defendant expressly consents; (ii) The state's evidence is unavailable and the prosecution has exercised due diligence; or (iii) Required in the due administration of justice and the defendant will not be substantially prejudiced; and (C) If a continuance is proposed by the state or the court, the defendant shall be notified. If the defendant objects, the defendant must show in writing how the delay may prejudice the defense. (5) Any request to continue a trial to a date more than six months from the date of arraignment must be directed to the court to which appeals from the trial would be taken”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.