State v. Tenney’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2025
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Benson v. Empire State Bank · State v. Dunn · People v. . Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those portions of the expert witnesses' testimony to which defendant objects quite clearly state legal conclusions because the witnesses tie their opinions to the requirements of Utah law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“no bright line between responses that embrace an ultimate issue and those that provide an impermissible legal conclusion,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“‘“[1] [t]he actions or remarks of [the prosecutor] call to the attention of the jury a matter it would not be justified in considering in determining its verdict and, [2] if so, under the circumstances of the particular case, whether the error is substantial and prejudicial such that there is a reasonable likelihood that, in its absence, there would have been a more favorable result.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Basta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.