State v. Maupin’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Stenson (1997), State v. Thomas (2004)
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Texas · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Boyd v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The right to offer the testimony of witnesses, and to compel their attendance, if necessary, is in plain terms the right to present a defense.... This right is a fundamental element of due process of law.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“coupled with other evidence tending to connect such other person with the actual commission of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[A] criminal defendant has no constitutional right to have irrelevant evidence admitted in his or her defense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Atsbeha
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.