Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 P2D 856 - Loftus v. Romsa Construction, Inc.

Loftus v. Romsa Construction, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2025

3 state decisions

101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. · City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co. · Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. · Rogers v. United States · 121 Ga. App. 342 - Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the presentation of affirmative defenses by motion will depend upon a conclusion that there is no prejudice to the opposing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] party should not be deprived of his right to prevail on the merits by some technical failure in the pleadings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the assertion of an affirmative defense in a motion for summary judgment is not only appropriate, but is just.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.