913 So. 2d 1011 - Simmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bahe · Kennick v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall have authority, after a hearing, to continue or revoke all or any part of probation or all or any part of the suspension of sentence, and may in case of revocation proceed to deal with the case as if there had been no probation.... Upon the revocation of probation or suspension of sentence of any offender, such offender shall be placed in the legal custody of the State Department of Corrections and shall be subject to the requirements thereof. [[Image here]] No part of the time that one is on probation shall be considered as any part of the time that he shall be sentenced to serve.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schwend v. State“probation does not equal time served and cannot be credited toward a suspended sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.